I have written a little post up about the theory of inherent dishonesty in theism for purposes of clarity. Should you choose to use it, please link to the page at Rational Responders.
http://www.rationalresponders.com/theory_inherent_dishonesty_theism
The theory of inherent dishonesty in theism can be seen whenever a theist defends belief in god. The theory explains that while defending belief in god a theist must act ignorant dishonest or both.
There has never been an honest and intelligent defense of theism. This theory has been observed in every atheist/theist debate since the theory was originally coined around the year 2000. This page will be updated if an argument arises on behalf of theism that is both honest and based on factual data.
Explain the logic underlying that conclusion, please. Your having stated that there has never been an honest and intelligent defense of theism means absolutely nothing otherwise.
It wasn’t a formal proof needing a logical explanation. It was an observation based on many years of experience. I have observed this theory “in every atheist/theist debate since the theory was originally coined around the year 2000.”
Well “This page will be updated if an argument arises on behalf of theism that is both honest and based on factual data” can only be supplied in the case that I review each encounter you have had or supply a new one.
Lets You and I debate One on One theism / atheism.
Comments are closed.